Wall Racking

Looking for a bit to replace that broken/worn out/stolen wotsit...

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Graham_U
surf god
surf god
Posts: 981
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:08
Location: Nth.Wiltshire

Wall Racking

Post by Graham_U »

I'm looking for some racking for the garage wall that will take boards 60- 69cm wide, two Kombats and two Rockets. I think finding something that will take the iSonic155 at 98.5cm might be pushing my luck. Currently most of the racks I've found on the web are designed for smaller surfboards with supports only about 30-35 cm long, or single board arrangement.
Graham
User avatar
dro
surf god
surf god
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 09:58
Location: south wales

Re: Wall Racking

Post by dro »

I find distributing them randomly around the floor works perfectly and the car gets a free wash in the rain outside.
Job done
Lt
P.s.
If you need any more help Graham just let me know
What do you mean not ENOUGH wind ?
User avatar
Graham_U
surf god
surf god
Posts: 981
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:08
Location: Nth.Wiltshire

Re: Wall Racking

Post by Graham_U »

I remember that Huw. the trouble is I've run out of floor space and I was at least pretending to try to tidy it up a little.
Graham
User avatar
dro
surf god
surf god
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 09:58
Location: south wales

Re: Wall Racking

Post by dro »

No problem just start another layer that's the way to maximise space usage.
Admittedly not so easy to access. Lower layer but hey you can't have everything.
Enjoy

Lt

Ps
How about Lemnos in September?
What do you mean not ENOUGH wind ?
User avatar
Graham_U
surf god
surf god
Posts: 981
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:08
Location: Nth.Wiltshire

Re: Wall Racking

Post by Graham_U »

Unfortunately Huw that sort of defeats the object of being able to find the pair of boards I need and putting them in the back of the car quickly. :(

Not sure what we are doing for the late season break. I think Lesvos would probably be higher on the list that a return to Lemnos, just because we have not been then yet.
Graham
Post Reply